Legal Opinion

Northern Assurance Co. of England v. Borgelt

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1903No. 12,563PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from the district court for Lancaster county. Action by a foreign insurance company upon tbe bond of an agent. The facts appear in the opinion. Tried below before Frost, J. Judgment on demurrer to plaintiff’s petition.

1Opinion of the Court

Pound, C.

A firm of insurance agents furnished a bond to one of the companies which they represented, conditioned, among other things, that the agents should “in all respects observe and fulfill the instructions of the said company” and that they should “in all other respects well and faithfully perform their duties as such agents.” The agents, it is alleged, neglected to cancel a policy when directed so to do; and the company was afterwards compelled to pay a loss upon the policy. Thereupon the company brought an action upon the bond, alleging these facts. It appeared from the petition that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wicker v. HoppockSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. New England Fire & Marine Insurance v. RobinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Gilbert v. . WimanNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
  4. Nickels v. People's Building, Loan & Saving Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  5. Cassaday v. American Ins.Indiana Supreme Court · 1880

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dutton-Lainson Co. v. Continental InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Somers v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Levin v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. First Trust Co. v. Airedale Ranch & Cattle Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  5. County of Platte v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API