Fulghum v. . R. R.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Action to recover damages for personal injury alleged to have been sustained by the feme plaintiff at Bagley, N.C. on 29 January, 1909. At the conclusion of the evidence introduced by the plaintiffs, on motion of defendant's counsel there was a judgment of nonsuit. The plaintiffs appealed.
The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by Mr.Justice Brown. The defendant offered no evidence, and the following is an accurate statement of that offered by plaintiff:
Plaintiff was a passenger on defendant's train on the morning of 29 January, 1909, and left the train at Bagley, N.C. a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hinshaw v. Raleigh & Augusta Air Line R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Johns v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
3Cited by12 opinions
- Alamo v. Del RosarioCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Dunnevant v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Nowell v. BasnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Yazoo M.V.R. Co. v. SkaggsMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
- Woods v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.