In re Sargood
Supreme Court of Vermont
Habeas Corpus, brought to the Supreme Court for Bennington County at its May Term, 1912, and then heard on the pleadings. The opinion states the ease.
1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.
On September 15, 1904, the relator was duly committed to the state prison to serve a sentence, — designated herein as the “first sentence,” — for the term not exceeding four and one-half years, for the crime of felony of which he had been convicted in Bennington County Court. At the December term, 1904, of that court, he was convicted of the crime of perjury, and also of the crime of attempting to poison one Sanford Hicks and one Carrie Hicks. On December 31, 1904, the relator was sentenced on both of said convictions: in the perjury case, the sentence, — designated herein as the “second…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Blitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Simmons v. Georgia Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Bandfield v. BandfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- In re the Estate of GarcelonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Rigor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. KasperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- People v. VraniakIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. IngberNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- In Re HoughSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
- Westinghouse Electric Manufacturing Co. v. Barre & Montpelier Traction & Power Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.