Legal Opinion
Reed v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 15, 1967No. 4060PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, .Chief Judge.
'Appellant- was convicted of committing a lewd-, obscene and indecent act 1 in a rest room orí the fourth floor of a downtown department store. He claims five errors.
First, it is argued that because the offense, was of a homosexual nature, there was insufficient corroboration as required by Kelly v. United Spates, 90 U.S. App.D.C. 125, 194 F.2d 150 (195,2). fielly laid down the rule that the testimony of a single withess to a verbal invitation to sodomy should be received ánd considered with great caution, 2 that in such cases evidence of good character .is particularly…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- McKee v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Abraham W. BoldenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- District of Columbia v. WaltersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- McBride v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Bond v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- Wilson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
- United States v. StanleyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.