Crockett v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of Georgia
Limitations. Promissory notes. Administrators. Creditors. Pleirsatlaw. Interest. Verdict. Practice. Before Judge Gamble. Scriven superior court. May term, 1891.
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed.
An equitable proceeding was brought December 3, 1889, by Mrs. Mitchell, as administratrix of D. W. Mitchell, against Mrs. Crockett. The defendant’s de*167nmrrer was overruled. Upon the close of the testimony the court directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the balance claimed to be due on the note sued on. The defendant excepted for error in overruling the demurrer and in directing the verdict.
The petition alleged: P. R. Kittles in his lifetime executed to plaintiff a promissory note for $210.10, dated December 12, 1878, which note was for indebtedness of Kittles to D.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Taylor v. SuttonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
- Dulin v. Caldwell & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1859
- George v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
- Rogers v. Sandford KingsburySupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
- Griffin v. Augusta & Knoxville RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Central Bank & Trust Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Chamblee v. Atlanta Brewing & Ice Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Lawrimore v. Sun Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Lawrimore v. Sun Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974