Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Harrelson

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1993No. S-4746PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Robert Hughes was injured when the motorcycle he was driving collided with an automobile driven by Julie Harrelson. Harrelson was insured under a policy issued by Progressive Insurance Company (Progressive). The policy contained a $50,-000 bodily injury liability limitation.

Harrelson admitted liability. Progressive extended a “policy limits offer” of $50,000. In a motion for a statement of law, Hughes sought a ruling that Harrel-son’s insurance policy and two Alaska statutes, the Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act (AS 28.20.010-.640) and the Mandatory…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Denham v. BedfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Burton v. ForetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  4. Mellenberger v. SweeneyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Progressive Insurance Co. v. SimmonsAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Carney v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. HouleAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Therchik v. Grant Aviation, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. HarringtonAlaska Supreme Court · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API