Legal Opinion

Bernstein v. Hilton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 12, 1931No. 10874PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtVaughan, J.

For convenience, the parties to this suit will he designated as follows: Plaintiff in error as plaintiff, and defendant in error as defendant, the position they occupied in the trial court.

Plaintiff institutedRhis suit against defendant on November 12, 1926, to recover on a promissory note executed by defendant August 9, 1923, for $1,332, payable to the order of L. N. Rosenbaum & Co. Plaintiff alleged that said note was indorsed and transferred by L. N. Rosenbaum & Co., for a valuable con*644sideration to L. N. Rosenbaum, who subsequently indorsed and transferred it to plaintiff, who thereby…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Houston East & West Texas Railway Co. v. De WaltTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Ogden & Johnson v. BosseTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Barrett v. FeatherstoneTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Sterling v. De LauneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  5. Watson v. First National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. O'HARA v. HexterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API