O'HARA v. Hexter
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
HUMPHREYS, Justice.
Appellant, John G. O’Hara, appeals from a directed verdict. Louis J. Hexter had sued on an alleged $40,000 loan evidenced by a letter agreement and the First National Bank in Dallas became the substituted plaintiff upon Hexter’s death. Many of appellant’s twenty-one points of error are but shades of the other and the principal issue concerns the application in this case of Tex.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 3716 (Vernon 1928), commonly called “The Dead Man’s Statute,” and the parol evidence'rule. We hold the directed verdict was proper and any error in exclusion of evidence was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Henderson v. Travelers Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
- Lott v. LottTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- Otto v. OttoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- O'HARA v. HexterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Griffin v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- De La Fuente v. Home Savings Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
- Randle v. NCNB Texas National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
- Snider v. Grey, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
- Global Evangelism Educational Ministries, Inc. D/B/A Cornerstone Christian Schools v. Brandon Caddell, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
- Global Evangelism Educational Ministries, Inc. D/B/A Cornerstone Christian Schools v. Brandon Caddell, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009