Legal Opinion

Cook v. Day

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 3, 1916PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Knott Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Qpintoh of the Couet by

Chief Justice Millee — .

Affirming.

On April 25, 1913, the appellant, Seland Cook, entered into a written option contract with the appellee, May E. Day, for the sale óf appellant’s''undivided one-sixth interest in two tracts of land which he'had inherited from his father, Pierce Cook. One of these tracts was embraced in a 200-acre survey made by Pierce- Cook iii 1881 j the other tract of 100 acres was embraced in a survey made by Pierce Cook in 1887. ■ ■ • ■ ■

The two tracts were described, in a general way, by giving the names of the adjacent landowners, for a boundary.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ison v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Griffith v. YorkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Kolb v. DuboisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Roganville Lumber Co. v. Gulf, Beaumont & Kansas City Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  5. Lawson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Reiss v. WintersmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. Gillispie v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. Johnson v. GadberryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Morris v. GilliamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API