Cook v. Day
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Knott Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Qpintoh of the Couet by
Chief Justice Millee — .
Affirming.
On April 25, 1913, the appellant, Seland Cook, entered into a written option contract with the appellee, May E. Day, for the sale óf appellant’s''undivided one-sixth interest in two tracts of land which he'had inherited from his father, Pierce Cook. One of these tracts was embraced in a 200-acre survey made by Pierce- Cook iii 1881 j the other tract of 100 acres was embraced in a survey made by Pierce Cook in 1887. ■ ■ • ■ ■
The two tracts were described, in a general way, by giving the names of the adjacent landowners, for a boundary.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ison v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Griffith v. YorkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Kolb v. DuboisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Roganville Lumber Co. v. Gulf, Beaumont & Kansas City Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Lawson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
3Cited by13 opinions
- Reiss v. WintersmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Gillispie v. BlantonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Insurance Co. of North America v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Johnson v. GadberryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Morris v. GilliamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.