Legal Opinion

Adkins v. General Motors Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 3, 2006No. Nos. 05-2059-cv, 05-2308-cvPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

General Motors (“GM”) appeals from the judgment below in favor of William Adkins, asking this Court to vacate the jury verdict in Adkins’ favor and to reverse the district court’s denial of GM’s motion for judgment as a matter of law. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural posture of the case.

We conclude that GM should have prevailed on its motion for judgment as a matter of law as to Adkins’ breach of fiduciary duty claim, which was the sole claim that went to trial. There was no cognizable theory underlying this claim. To the extent that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tooley v. Donaldson, Lufkin, & Jenrette, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2004
  2. Empire Volkswagen Inc. v. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  3. Coleman v. TaubCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matsumura Ex Rel. Cutler v. Benihana National Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  2. Adkins v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  3. Csikos v. S.M. Construction & Contracting, IncorporatedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
  4. Hyundai Subaru of Nashville, Inc. v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API