Legal Opinion

Phelps v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1896No. 2235PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. William H. Pritchard, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, C. J.

Plaintiff sought to recover from the defendant upon three causes of action; two for money paid to the city upon certificates issued upon sales for void taxes, and one for money alleged to have been paid on account of a mistake of fact. Defendant, for answer to each of these causes of action, set up the fact that the city was indebted beyond the constitu-tional limit and for that reason could not be held liable to the plaintiff. To these answers a demurrer was interposed by the plaintiff, which was overruled I>y the court, and, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Richards v. Klickitat CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shelton v. Klickitat CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Corwin Investment Co. v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Pacific Finance Corp. v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Carlson v. StairCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Robinson v. Kittitas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API