Phelps v. City of Tacoma
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. William H. Pritchard, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hoyt, C. J.
Plaintiff sought to recover from the defendant upon three causes of action; two for money paid to the city upon certificates issued upon sales for void taxes, and one for money alleged to have been paid on account of a mistake of fact. Defendant, for answer to each of these causes of action, set up the fact that the city was indebted beyond the constitu-tional limit and for that reason could not be held liable to the plaintiff. To these answers a demurrer was interposed by the plaintiff, which was overruled I>y the court, and, the plaintiff…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Richards v. Klickitat CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shelton v. Klickitat CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Corwin Investment Co. v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Pacific Finance Corp. v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Carlson v. StairCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Robinson v. Kittitas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.