Legal Opinion

Van De Bogart v. Vanderpool

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 18, 1995PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Yesawich Jr., J. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Rose, J.), entered November 18, 1993 in Tioga County, upon a verdict rendered in favor of defendants.

After trial, a jury found that plaintiff Diane Van De Bogart (hereinafter plaintiff), who contends she was injured as a result of an automobile accident, had not sustained any impairment severe enough to constitute a "significant limitation of use of a body function or system”, the only category of serious injury (see, Insurance Law § 5102 [d]) as to which a charge was given. Plaintiff and her spouse seek a new trial. They fault…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Scheer v. KoubekNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Miller v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Countermine v. GalkaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Lanuto v. ConstantineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gillick v. KnightesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Yagliyan v. Gun Shik YangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Paolini v. SienkiewiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Wiley v. BednarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Judd v. WaltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API