Legal Opinion

City of Fairbanks Municipal Utilities System v. Lees

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1985No. S-560/S-597PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

This case concerns the proper scope of judicial review of an arbitration award. After holding a trial de novo, the superior court determined that the arbitrator’s exclusion of evidence during James Lees’ arbitration was gross error and deprived Lees of his right to due process. We find that the court erred in the scope of its review of the arbitration award. Furthermore, we hold that Lees was afforded his right to a fair hearing during arbitration. Therefore, we reverse the superior court’s decision.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

The City of Fairbanks Municipal Utilities System…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Amicizia Societa Navegazione v. Chilean Nitrate and Iodine Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  3. Allstate Insurance v. FioravantiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Pacific Vegetable Oil Corp. v. C.S.T., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1946
  5. University of Alaska v. Modern Construction, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Treacy v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Department of Public Safety v. Public Safety Employees Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Matzen Construction, Inc. v. Leander Anderson Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  4. Wilson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Flight Systems v. Paul A. Laurence Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API