Haase v. Blank
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
Appellants’ counsel contend that plaintiffs did not elect to declare the principal due; that due notice was not given before suit was brought; that the payment of $50 into court was made within a reasonable time; and that the plaintiffs, by reason of their actions and statements, are estopped to maintain foreclosure proceedings.
It is undisputed that the written notice served on defendant McClyman by plaintiff Mielke on March 21st declared in unmistakable terms that plaintiffs did thereby “exercise the option given them in said mortgage” and did “declare the whole amount of said mortgage,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fanning v. MurphyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Julien v. Model Building, Loan & Investment Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Felton v. StaceyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Rosseel v. JarvisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
- Radford v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mortgage Associates, Inc. v. Monona Shores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Jaudon v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Brown v. LoewenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Tate v. Atlanta Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Minn Billiard Co. v. SchwabWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922