Legal Opinion

Clark v. Simbeck

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 2008No. 71A03-0801-CV-5PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOFFMAN, Senior Judge.

Defendants-Appellants James G. Clark (“Clark”) and Larry A. Biddle, III (“Biddle”) appeal the trial court’s judgment in favor of Plaintiffs-Appellees Donald Sim-beck (Donald) and Janet Simbeck (“Janet”). We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

Clark and Biddle raise three issues for our review, which we renumber and restate as four issues (Donald and Janet *317raise a single issue, which we state as the final issue):

I. Whether the trial court erred in denying Clark and Biddle’s motion for continuance.

II. Whether the trial court erred in suggesting that Clark…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thacker v. WentzelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Evans v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Dunn v. CadienteIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Riggin v. Rea Riggin & Sons, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Fetner v. Maury Boyd & Associates, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clark v. SimbeckIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API