Legal Opinion
Colacino v. People
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 3, 1927No. 11,587PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Whitford
The defendant was convicted of having in his possession for personal use intoxicating liquors, and prosecutes this writ of error for relief from the consequences of that judgment.
Counsel’s contention that the legislature has provided no penalty for the offense charged in the information, is foreclosed by the case of McConnell v. People, 73 Colo. 99, 213 Pac. 674.
Counsel further contends that the provision of section 3701, C. L. 1921, under which defendant was convicted, is void, because beyond the purview of article XXII of the state Constitution. Article XXII prohibits the manufacture,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Crane v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Hoffman v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Daugherty v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Peck v. FarnhamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
- McConnell v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City and County of Denver v. SweetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- People v. AguiarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Denver Milk Producers, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
- Denver Milk Producers, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947