Legal Opinion · Dissent

Indiana Department of Environmental Management v. Conard

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1993No. 36S01-9305-CV-560Published

1DissentGivan, Justice

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion in this case. Because the Court of Appeals opinion is published at 589 N.E.2d 1195, I feel it is unnecessary to go into detail. I would point out, however, the conclusion reached by the Court of Appeals follows what I consider to be a well-reasoned approach to the case. }

At page 1200, the Court of Appeals states:

"In sum, IDEM [Indiana Department of Environmental Management] is not bound by the Decree in the way that the ALJ [Administrative Law Judge] interpreted it. Holding a hearing on this issue is not a collateral attack on the Decree…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Indiana Department of Environmental Management v. ConardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API