Indiana Department of Environmental Management v. Conard
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RATLIFF, Chief Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Westinghouse Electric Corporation ("Westinghouse") appeals from a judgment reversing a final administrative order of the Water Pollution Control Board ("WPCB"). The judgment determined that a certain consent decree ("Decree") does not mandate a one part per billion ("ppb") limit for polychlorinated _ biphenyls ("PCBs") in certain treated waters, and that the Decree's provisions are not binding on a permitting process.1 We affirm.
ISSUE
We address one consolidated and restated issue on appeal:
Did the trial court properly hold that the Decree does not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Jewell Grain Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Cromer v. SeftonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- In Re the Marriage of MoserIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Turner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
- International Fidelity Ins. Co., Inc. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Indiana Department of Environmental Management v. ConardIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Hunter v. ByrdIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Indiana Department of Environmental Management v. ConardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Indiana Department of Environmental Management v. ConardIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Indiana Department of Environmental Management v. ConardIndiana Supreme Court · 1993