Legal Opinion

Indiana Department of Environmental Management v. Conard

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1992No. 36A01-9107-CV-223PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RATLIFF, Chief Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Westinghouse Electric Corporation ("Westinghouse") appeals from a judgment reversing a final administrative order of the Water Pollution Control Board ("WPCB"). The judgment determined that a certain consent decree ("Decree") does not mandate a one part per billion ("ppb") limit for polychlorinated _ biphenyls ("PCBs") in certain treated waters, and that the Decree's provisions are not binding on a permitting process.1 We affirm.

ISSUE

We address one consolidated and restated issue on appeal:

Did the trial court properly hold that the Decree does not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Jewell Grain Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Cromer v. SeftonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. In Re the Marriage of MoserIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Turner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  5. International Fidelity Ins. Co., Inc. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Indiana Department of Environmental Management v. ConardIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hunter v. ByrdIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Indiana Department of Environmental Management v. ConardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Indiana Department of Environmental Management v. ConardIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Indiana Department of Environmental Management v. ConardIndiana Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API