Ben v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York rejecting appellant’s claim for certain tax refunds. The issue and the facts are well stated in the opinion of the court below. 139 F.Supp. 883. Although the case is a close one, we cannot say the District Court improperly refused to upset the administrator’s determination that the applicators were “employees” within the statutory scheme. United States v. Silk, 331 U.S. 704, 67 S.Ct. 1463, 91 L.Ed. 1757; Bartels v. Birmingham, 332 U.S. 126, 67 S.Ct. 1547, 91 L.Ed. 1947; Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bartels v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Ben v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1956
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lifetime Siding, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Ben Construction Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Billy G. Powers, T/a Powers Roofing Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Ben Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Etherton v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.