Legal Opinion

Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v. Higgins

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 8, 1951No. 21999_1PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a district court judgment dismissing on the merits its complaint in an action for refund of $3,105.79 paid on or about June 10, 1938, as unemployment taxes for the year 1936. The sole question is whether certain persons engaged in plaintiff’s circus in 1936 were employees, as the trial court held, or " independent contractors, in which case the tax is not applicable. Involved are only a part of the persons engaged in producing the circus. In addition to 1,200 non-production employees, plaintiff has paid the tax, without objection, upon such…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Bartels v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Radio City Music Hall Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Avis Rent a Car System, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. Breaux and Daigle, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. Cape Shore Fish Co., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  4. Illinois Tri-Seal Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  5. Texas Carbonate Company v. R. L. Phinney, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API