Rundell v. McDonald
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered against plaintiff after general demurrer was sustained to his complaint, without leave to amend.
The only question to consider is the sufficiency of the complaint to state a cause of action. The parties to the appeal are the plaintiff and the defendant McDonald as administrator and in person.
The complaint alleges the following: On the 20th of February, 1912, plaintiff was the owner of a house and lot in Santa Barbara, California, of the value of three thousand dollars; on or about that date he entered into an agreement with Mary Ann Rundell, his…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Owens v. McNallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Baker v. SyfrittSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- McCabe v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Bolman v. OverallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Logan v. ShelbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Rundell v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Arland v. ArlandWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Estate of GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Gejelian v. DokoozlianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.