Legal Opinion

Condos v. Home Development Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1954No. 5764PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHELPS, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by defendants Tom Condos and Sophia Condos, his wife, from a judgment of the superior court of Pima County in favor of plaintiff-appellees Home Development Company, a corporation, enjoining defendants from selling intoxicating liquors upon Lot 8, Block 67 of National City subdivision No. 5 to the city of Tucson in violation of a restrictive covenant against the sale of such liquors thereon, and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. The parties will be referred to as the Company and defendants. The action was originally brought by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Benner v. Tacony Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Cuneo v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Continental Oil Co. v. FennemoreArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Alamogordo Improvement Co. v. PrendergastNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Whitaker v. HolmesArizona Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Riley v. StovesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  3. Burke v. Voicestream Wireless Corp. IICourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. Carter v. ConroyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Donahoe v. MarstonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API