Romero v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Curiam.
Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Read, J.), entered February 20, 2001, upon a decision of the court in favor of the State.
After a Schenectady County jury convicted claimant of unlawful practice of law and petit larceny, claimant appealed to this Court arguing, inter alia, that the Attorney General did not have the authority to prosecute him for those crimes. We affirmed the convictions indicating that, even if the Attorney General did not have the power to proceed under Judiciary Law § 476-a (1), such authority existed pursuant to Executive Law § 63 (3) (People v Romero,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Broughton v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Colon v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Bernard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Martinez v. City of SchenectadyNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Smith-Hunter v. HarveyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Nazario v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Moulton v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- De Cicco v. Madison CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Russ v. State Employees Federal Credit UnionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Mahoney v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.