Legal Opinion

Downing v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 2011No. S-10-0128PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Justice.

[¶1] After a jury trial, the appellant was convicted of one count of unlawful delivery of a controlled substance, morphine. He now appeals that conviction, challenging several district court rulings and the competence of defense counsel, and alleging prosecutorial misconduct, as well as cumulative error. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

ISSUE

[T2] The appellant presented ten issues for our review, but we will address only the single issue we find to be dispositive:

Did the district court abuse its discretion in prohibiting the appellant from producing evidence attacking the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robert Olaf Anderson v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Travis J. Kovach v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Counts v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Joseph D. LaJeunesse v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API