Legal Opinion

International Business Machines Corp. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 19, 2003No. 02-1356Published

1Opinion of the Court

DYK, Circuit Judge.

International Business Machines (“IBM”) appeals the Court of International Trade’s decision holding that it is not entitled to interest on the Harbor Maintenance Tax on exports (“HMT”) it paid. Int’l Bus. Machs. Corp. v. United States, No. 94-10-00625, slip op. at 3, 2002 WL 253951 (Ct. It’l Trade Feb. 21, 2002) (“Final Order”). We affirm.

BACKGROUND

On October 24, 1994, IBM filed a complaint in the Court of International Trade for a refund of the HMT it had paid up to that point. Another HMT payer, United States Shoe Corporation, filed a substantively identical complaint in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc., Exxon Corporation and Exxon Research & Engineering Company v. The Lubrizol CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  3. United States Shoe Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  4. International Business MacHines Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  5. United States Shoe Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API