Legal Opinion

State v. DeCamp

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 27, 1999No. 1 CA-CR 98-0384PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EHRLICH, Judge.

¶ 1 William Lee DeCamp (“defendant”) appeals his convictions and sentences for possession of marijuana for sale, possession of dangerous drugs for sale and misconduct involving weapons. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized from his room pursuant to a search warrant. He also argues that the court erred in permitting his only witness, his mother, to be impeached with a felony conviction undisclosed by the state until immediately before she testified.

FACTS 1 AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 The Phoenix Police Department received…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Murray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. State v. SpearsArizona Supreme Court · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BurrowsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  2. State v. GomezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
  3. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  4. State v. KeetenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  5. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API