Legal Opinion

Chieftain Royalty Company v. SM Energy Company

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided June 22, 2022No. 5:11-cv-00177Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA CHIEFTAIN ROYALTY COMPANY, ) on its behalf and as representative of a ) class of similarly situated royalty owners, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-11-177-D ) ENERVEST ENERGY INSTITUTIONAL ) FUND XIII-A, L.P, et al., ) ) Defendants, ) ) and ) ) CHARLES DAVID NUTLEY, et al., ) ) Objectors. ) ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Class Counsel’s Renewed Motion for Approval of Attorneys’ Fees from Common Fund [Doc. No. 302]. The Motion is supported by a Memorandum of Law [Doc. No. 303] and a voluminous record…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  4. In Re Rite Aid Corporation Securities Litigation Class Member/objector Walter KaufmannCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  5. Prandini v. National Tea Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API