Legal Opinion

In Re Essential Therapeutics, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware

Decided June 13, 2003No. 19-10468PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION 1

MARY F. WALRATH, Bankruptcy Judge.

Before the Court is the Application of Essential Therapeutics, Inc., and its related entities (collectively “the Debtors”) to retain Bingham McCutchen LLP (“Bingham”) as counsel for the Debtors. The United States Trustee (“the UST”) has objected to the Application, asserting that Bingham is not “disinterested” as required by sections 327(a) and 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

For the reasons set forth below, we deny the Debtors’ Application.

I.FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The Debtors are biopharmaceutical companies committed to the discovery, development and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Rake v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. In Re Philadelphia Athletic Club, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. United States Trustee v. Price Waterhouse Sharon Steel Corporation Sharon Specialty Steel Inc. Monessen IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. In Re Envirodyne Industries, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Young Mens Christian Ass'n of Marquette CountyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2017
  2. McDermott International, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2020
  3. NRCT, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API