Legal Opinion

United States v. Hemme

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 3, 1986No. 84-1944PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall

Appellees, identified as the trustee of the “revocable living trust” of Charles W. Hirschi and transferees of Hirschi’s property, seek a refund of $6,000 in estate taxes, on the ground that the Government’s interpretation of a statutory transitional rule, enacted to bridge the old and new regimes for the federal taxation of gifts and estates, violates both the statute and the Constitution.

I

Prior to 1977, the gift tax and the estate tax were imposed, calculated, and collected separately. The gift tax, imposed on donors of certain gifts, permitted each taxpayer a lifetime exemption of $30,000…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Welch v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Blodgett v. HoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Heiner v. DonnanSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Milliken v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Untermyer v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. CarltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Commonwealth Edison Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  4. John M. Quarty, Personal Representative of the Estate of Angele C. Quarty Elizabeth B. Cherne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Annenberg v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API