United States v. Hemme
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall
Appellees, identified as the trustee of the “revocable living trust” of Charles W. Hirschi and transferees of Hirschi’s property, seek a refund of $6,000 in estate taxes, on the ground that the Government’s interpretation of a statutory transitional rule, enacted to bridge the old and new regimes for the federal taxation of gifts and estates, violates both the statute and the Constitution.
I
Prior to 1977, the gift tax and the estate tax were imposed, calculated, and collected separately. The gift tax, imposed on donors of certain gifts, permitted each taxpayer a lifetime exemption of $30,000…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Welch v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Blodgett v. HoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Heiner v. DonnanSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Milliken v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Untermyer v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. CarltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Commonwealth Edison Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- John M. Quarty, Personal Representative of the Estate of Angele C. Quarty Elizabeth B. Cherne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Annenberg v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.