Legal Opinion

Dembinski v. Thomas

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County

Decided June 8, 2000No. 96-C-3039VPublished

1Opinion of the Court

BLACK, J.,

In this wrongful death and survival action, plaintiff has filed a motion in limine to preclude evidence of the decedent’s alleged heroin usage, some six years prior to his death. Plaintiff contends that this evidence is not relevant, and that even if relevant, its prejudicial effect outweighs whatever probative value it may have. For the reasons set forth below, we disagree with plaintiff’s contentions and find that this evidence is admissible.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The factual background of this case is set forth in detail in our opinion of June 23, 1999, denying the summary judgment…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kraus v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Henery v. ShadleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. James Everette Carroll, Administrator of the Estate of Michael Eugene Carroll on Behalf of All Heirs of Said Deceased v. Dr. John D. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. Capan v. Divine Providence HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Chicchi v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API