Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Rio Grande River Ltd. Partnership
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 18, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION No. 13-11189-WGYPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
YOUNG, DISTRICT JUDGE.
I. INTRODUCTION
John Marshall (“Marshall”) brought this suit against Rio Grande River Limited Partnership (“Rio Grande”) alleging that Rio Grande’s property at 2343 Washington Street, Boston, Massachusetts (the “Property”) had architectural barriers that prevented Marshall from entering it, see Compl. 1-2, ECF No. 1, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213. Virtually on the eve of trial Marshall and Rio Grande agreed to settle. See Settlement Order Dismissal, ECF No. 91. Thereafter, Rio Grande tried…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Annabelle Lipsett v. Gumersindo BlancoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Torres-Rivera v. O'Neill-CancelCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alexander v. MiciDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024
- Alston v. Town of BrooklineDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
- Cosenza v. City of WorcesterDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
- Cox v. Massachusetts Department of Correction, et.al.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
- Thomas v. Century 7909 LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2022