Legal Opinion

Bond v. Marlin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 8, 1940No. 4-5721PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHumphreys, J.

Appellants, J. B. Bond and W. M. Coats, were the plaintiffs in the lower court, and appellee, Tom Marlin, was defendant, and appellant, Gertrude Doyle, was an intervener.

The abstract of the pleadings appearing in appellants’ brief is correct and clearly presents the issues involved in the litigation and, rather than attempt to abbreviate the pleadings ourselves, we adopt and incorporate them in this opinion as a concise statement of the issues involved.' They are as follows:

On February 1, 1938, appellants, J. B. Bond and W. M. Coats, filed suit in the Union chancery court against appellee,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thweatt v. FreemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  2. Swaim v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  3. McMillan v. BrookfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gregory v. MooseCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Alexander v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Duvall v. Laws, Swain & Murdoch, P.A.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Duvall v. Laws, Swain & Murdoch, P.A.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API