Legal Opinion · Dissent
Parkin Prtg. & Stat. Co. v. Ark. Prtg. & Litho. Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided February 26, 1962No. 5-2692Published
1DissentSam Robinson, Associate Justice
In holding that the Highway Department is a part of the executive department of government within the meaning of Article IV, Sec. 1 of the Constitution, the majority has read something into the Constitution that is not there. The majority points to no provision of the Constitution nor to any decision that supports the view that the Highway Department is a part of the executive department. On the other hand, we have a constitutional provision and decisions construing it supporting the position that the Highway Department is not a part of the executive department.
Article IV, Sec. 1 of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Humphrey's v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Hickenbottom v. McCain, Comm'r of LaborSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Kelley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Fiser v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
- City of Fort Smith v. Department of Public UtilitiesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.