Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Sack
Appellate Court of Illinois
Action on the case. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Carroll County; the Hon. Oscar E. Heard, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Willis
delivered the opinion of the court.
This was an action on the case brought in the Circuit Court of Carroll county, hy the administrators of the estate of Henry Sack, deceased, against the C., B. & Q. Ry. Co. and the C., B. & Q. R. R. Co., to recover damages for the loss of support hy the widow and next kin of deceased, who was killed hy a train of appellant, while attempting to cross its tracks on a public street in the village of Chadwick. The suit against the C., B. & Q. R. R. Co. was afterwards dismissed and the declaration amended accordingly. The cause was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Railroad Company v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Ernst v. . Hudson River Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. HansenIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Calumet Iron & Steel Co. v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. HessionsIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Derges v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909
- Marren v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1913