Legal Opinion
Nez v. United States
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided February 13, 2019No. 16-CV-0527-MV-KBMPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTHA VÁZQUEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
*1251THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law [Doc. 49], United States' Trial Brief [Doc. 50], Plaintiff's Requested Findings and Conclusions [Doc. 78], and Defendant's Requested Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law [Doc. 81]. The Court, having considered the briefs, relevant law, trial testimony, exhibits, and being otherwise fully informed, finds that judgment must be entered in favor of Plaintiff and that Plaintiff is entitled to the relief requested, with the exception of damages for loss of consortium.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Aramburu v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Hatahley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Murphy v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
- Salzman v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
- Santa Fe Goldworks Inc. and David Griego v. Turquoise Trails, LLC, Ahmad Shawabkeh, Eden on the Plaza, LLC, Majed Hamdouni, Rachid Saghrouni, Francheska Sandoval, and Mark SuleimanDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2026