Legal Opinion

Kline v. Combined Ins. Co. of America

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 27, 1990No. Civ. 7360PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a workmen's compensation case.

After ore tenus proceedings the court determined that Kline had suffered a fifty percent permanent partial loss of earning capacity. There is no dispute that Kline's injuries arose out of and in the course of her employment with Combined Insurance Company of America (Combined). Kline appeals, contending that there is no evidence to support the court's judgment and that the evidence will only support her contention that she is permanently and totally disabled.

Our review of a workmen's compensation case is limited to determining whether there is any legal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Bankhead Forest Industries, Inc. v. LovettCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  3. Allen v. Diversified ProductsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nance v. NanceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  2. Wright v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  3. Morrow Drilling Co. v. AdkinsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  4. Acustar, Inc. v. GuerinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  5. Alabama Power Co. v. MackeyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API