Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Patterson
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 12, 1990No. 88-1619PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Calvin Patterson sustained personal injuries while employed by Opelika Foundry Company, Inc. ("the Foundry"). He subsequently filed a complaint in Lee County Circuit Court, seeking compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, Ala. Code 1975, § 25-5-1 et seq. After hearing ore tenus evidence, the trial court found that Patterson's injuries were not caused by an accident that arose out of his employment and entered a judgment denying his claim. Patterson appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals, which affirmed the judgment. See Patterson v.Opelika Foundry Co., 561 So.2d 234 (Ala.Civ.App.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex Parte PriceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Slimfold Mfg. Co. v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Massey v. United States Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Southern Cotton Oil Company v. WynnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Ex Parte NealSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Ex Parte Eastwood Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Brown v. PattonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2011
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. MorganCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- Avery v. Geneva CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Francis Powell Enterprises, Inc. v. AndrewsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.