Madera Irrigation District v. Hancock
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
985 F.2d 1397
23 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,579
MADERA IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
Natural Resources Defense Council, et al., Intervenors-Appellees,
and
Chowchilla Water District, Plaintiff,
v.
Lawrence F. HANCOCK, as Regional Director of the Mid-Pacific
Region of the United States Bureau of Reclamation; Dennis
Underwood, as Commissioner of Reclamation, United States
Department of the Interior, and; Manuel Lujan, Jr., as
Secretary of the Interior of the United States of America,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-16013.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted June 8, 1992.
Decided…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. KempthorneDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009