Legal Opinion

Madera Irrigation District v. Hancock

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 8, 1993No. 91-16013PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

985 F.2d 1397

23 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,579

MADERA IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

Natural Resources Defense Council, et al., Intervenors-Appellees,

and

Chowchilla Water District, Plaintiff,

v.

Lawrence F. HANCOCK, as Regional Director of the Mid-Pacific

Region of the United States Bureau of Reclamation; Dennis

Underwood, as Commissioner of Reclamation, United States

Department of the Interior, and; Manuel Lujan, Jr., as

Secretary of the Interior of the United States of America,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-16013.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted June 8, 1992.

Decided…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Natural Resources Defense Council v. KempthorneDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API