Legal Opinion

Arizonans for Fair Elections v. Hobbs

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided April 17, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00658Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Arizonans for Fair Elections, et al., No. CV-20-00658-PHX-DWL 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Katie Hobbs, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 INTRODUCTION 16 In Arizona, the people’s right to enact laws via the initiative process is sacrosanct. 17 This right has been enshrined in Arizona’s constitution since Arizona’s inception, and the 18 debate over whether to adopt it was the “burning” and “most important” question raised 19 during Arizona’s constitutional convention. Whitman v. Moore,

125 P.2d 445, 450

(Ariz. 20…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API