Legal Opinion

Miller v. Young

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1917No. Docket No. 76PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Eaton; Smith, J. Assumpsit by Rosa Miller against Daniel J. Young for money received upon the sale of certain sheep belonging to plaintiff. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Plaintiff declared in this action on the common counts in assumpsit, filing a bill of particulars of her demand as follows:

“For money received by defendant from Ben Gillett upon the sale of a certain flock of sheep belonging to the plaintiff, and sold by defendant to said Gillett on or about the month of October, A. D. 1910, $318. Interest thereon from the date of sale to the date of judgment.”

Defendant pleaded the general issue, with special notice of the statute of limitations, and payment in full of any and all amounts owing plaintiff “upon said several supposed causes of action.” The case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Willett v. PorterIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Dubuc v. . Lazell, Dalley Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Bedal v. SpurrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Highway Commissioner v. Gulf Oil Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
  2. People v. LittleMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Trudell v. PearllMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Scott v. Angie’s, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Scott v. Angie’s, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API