Roe v. Pitts
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The second contention of the plaintiff in error will be first considered. This is to the effect that the ordinary had a discretion to issue letters of administration de bonis non to a creditor of the estate under the provisions of Code § 113-1202(5) which provides as follows: “Where no application shall be made by the next of kin, a creditor may be appointed; and among creditors, as a general rule, the one having the greatest interest shall be preferred.” Code § 102-103, which sets out the meaning of certain words in the construction of statutes, provides…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Allen, Ball & Co. v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
- Moody v. MoodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
- Myers v. CannSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Hartley v. HolwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Tanner v. HussSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hall v. First National Bank of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Simpson v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- Hughes v. Star Bonding Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Smith v. GoodwinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- McCray v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.