Legal Opinion

Smith v. Goodwin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 1951No. 33599PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

It is contended by the caveator that the trial court erred in overruling her demurrer to the amendment filed by the applicants after the case reached the superior court on appeal from the court of ordinary on the grounds that the amendment sought to add a new party to the cause of action, and sought to base applicants’ claim on a fact not in existence at the time of filing the petition. Code § 6-501 provides as follows : “An appeal to the superior court is a de novo investigation. It brings up the whole record from the court below and all competent evidence…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rainey v. MoonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Moody v. MoodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
  3. Wofford v. VandiverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  4. Tanner v. HussSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  5. Megahee v. MegaheeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Howe v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. McClinton v. SullivanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. Alexander v. FontenotCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  4. Garrison v. McGuireCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API