Beyer v. Zindorf
Washington Supreme Court
. Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurston county, Wright, J., entered March 31, 1921, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff as against the contractor and dismissed as to the state, in an action to recover for labor and materials furnished on a state highway.
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
Plaintiff desires to recover for labor and material performed and furnished on a state highway under a contract entered into August 5, 1916, between the state highway board and the defendant, M. P. Zindorf. The contract contemplated the grading of part of the National Park highway, located in Pacific county. Under the contract, the price to be *200paid for the work amounted to $25,550.21. The work was to be completed by August 20, 1917. On account of the failure of Zindorf to complete his work according to his contract, the state highway department took charge of the job on August 31, 1917, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Northwestern National Bank v. Guardian Casualty & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Washington National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- State ex rel. Bartelt v. LiebesWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Dowling v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1900
- Dyer v. Middle Kittitas Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hall & Olswang v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Pacific Coast Steel Co. v. Old National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Guthrie Investments, Inc. v. BennettWashington Supreme Court · 1964