Legal Opinion
Brule v. Nerac, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 15, 2011No. AC 31834PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*317 Opinion
STOUGHTON, J.
The plaintiffs, James Brule, Stephen Warner and Dawn Wynkoop, appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendants, Nerac, Inc. (Nerac), and five individual employees1 of Nerac (individual defendants), following the court’s granting of the defendants’ motion to strike. The plaintiffs, former employees of Nerac, commenced this action against the defendants following the termination of their employment.2 On appeal, they claim that the court (1) improperly concluded that Warner’s contract based claims were insufficient as a matter of law and (2)…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- D'Ulisse-Cupo v. Board of Directors of Notre Dame High SchoolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Magnan v. Anaconda Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Curry v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Sheiman v. Lafayette Bank & Trust Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nicholas T. Long v. Dell, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014
- Nicholas T. Long v. Dell, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014