Legal Opinion

Keim v. Big Bass, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 1997No. 70352PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMM, Judge.

In this negligence action, plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant. We affirm.

Plaintiff raises only one point. He alleges the trial court erred in converting defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings to a motion for summary judgment “without affording [him] the procedural safeguards of Rule 74.04 as required by Rule 55.27.”

I. Background

In his amended petition filed May 18,1993, plaintiff alleged that on May 9, 1992 defendant operated a raceway. On that date, plaintiff paid an admission fee. While at the raceway, he was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Counts v. Morrison-Knudsen, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Miller v. Ernst & YoungMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Mathes by and Through Mathes v. NolanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Pennell v. PolenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. JOACHIM SAV. & LOAN ASSOCIATION v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hale Ex Rel. Hale v. City of JeffersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Sale v. SlitzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. J.B. Allen, Inc. v. PearsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Fulkerson v. W.A.M. InvestmentsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API