Legal Opinion

Pennell v. Polen

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1980No. WD 31231PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHANGLER, Judge.

The plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment under Rule 74.04.

The plaintiff brought an action for breach of contract for the sale of the issued corporation stock. The answer to the petition alleged failure of consideration, illegality, mutual mistake and unconscionability. The defendant elicited discovery by request to the plaintiff for admissions of fact. On the morning of trial, the defendant presented a motion to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action or, alternatively, for summary judgment. The court engaged counsel in discussion on the motion and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sam Kraus Co. v. State Highway Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. Ellis v. Jewish Hospital of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Kelley v. SchnebelenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Advance Concrete & Asphalt Co. v. IngelsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Sherwood Estates Homes Ass'n v. WattMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. LawsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Executive Board of the Missouri Baptist Convention v. Windermere Baptist Conference CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. RGB2, INC. v. Chestnut Plaza, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Aman Collection Service, Inc. v. BurgessMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Tobler's Flowers, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API