Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Zimmerman
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 9, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-1427PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
MENCER, District Judge.
The instant petition for writ of habeas corpus was referred to United States Magistrate Gary L. Lancaster in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 3 and 4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.
On April 18, 1989, the Magistrate filed his Report and Recommendation, which concluded that the petition should be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Petitioner filed objections on May 2, 1989. After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Pedro H. Valdez, Wasang Tomas Mock, Jorge Garcia, and Raul RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. RoblesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Eric Shaw Gibson v. Charles L. Ryan, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2018
- G. Brooks v. Office of the District AttorneyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- KARNGBAYE v. HARRYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024