Legal Opinion

Sarmiento v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided November 14, 2002No. 14-00-01297-CRPublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

J. HARVEY HUDSON, Justice.

In a unanimous panel opinion, this Court affirmed appellant’s conviction, but reformed the judgment of the trial court to delete an affirmative finding of the use or exhibition of a deadly weapon during the commission of the offense. The panel acknowledged conflicting authority regarding the propriety of an affirmative finding, but was obliged by stare decisis to follow previous panel opinions of this Court. The State has asked that we reconsider our interpretation of Article 42.12 of the Texas Code of Criminal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Polk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Patterson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Travelstead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  5. Tate v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. LaFleur v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. Ronald Glen Boston v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
  3. Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
  4. Hooper v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  5. Nzewi v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API