Legal Opinion

Newman v. Newman

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 11, 2000No. B132850PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, J.

In this case we hold that Family Code section 4908 does not divest a California court from making a spousal or child support order, even though a marriage dissolution is pending or has been granted in another state and the California spouse has not challenged the jurisdiction of that state, so long as the out-of-state proceeding does not raise an issue concerning such support.1

Factual and Procedural Summary

The parties to this litigation are D’Arcy J. Newman (Wife) and Louis V. Newman (Husband). They were married in 1967 and lived together in California until their separation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State of South Dakota v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. In Re MorganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Estate of PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stone v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Rassier v. RassierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Marriage of Caffery and Burns CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API