Legal Opinion

State v. Fry

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1971No. 715SC529PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MALLARD, Chief Judge.

Defendant contends that the trial judge committed error in failing to suppress the testimony of Officer Howell of the New Hanover County Sheriff’s Department and in subsequently allowing the three bags of marihuana to be introduced into evidence.

Officer Howell was testifying and was asked the question: “What did you see when you opened the door?” Defendant ob- jeeted. No ruling on this objection was1 made by the judge, and the witness did not at that time answer the question. However, the judge sent the jury out; and after extensive questioning of the witness Howell, the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. State v. DuboiseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Armour v. TottyTennessee Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Shellady v. SellersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  3. Saunders v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  4. State v. CarrCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. ParksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API